Higher-derivative gravitational effective field theories are generically weakly hyperbolic

Author(s)

Thaalba, Farid, Abalos, Fernando, Bezares, Miguel

Abstract

We analyse the initial-value problem of metric higher-derivative effective theories of gravity. We show that any such theory whose characteristic velocities are independent of derivatives of the metric is intrinsically weakly hyperbolic, independently of the gauge fixing. To show this, we identify the spin-$2$ physical sector directly from the characteristic equation; this can be done without introducing an order-reduced formulation, which greatly simplifies the computation. In this sector, every metric theory with more than two derivatives in the equations of motion contains a weakly hyperbolic block. Since this obstruction is physical, no choice of gauge or constraint addition can remove it, providing a structural explanation for the failure of strong hyperbolicity in this broad class of theories.

References
  • [1] M. A. Scheel et al., The SXS collaboration’s third catalog of binary black hole simulations, Class. Quant. Grav. 42, 195017 (2025), arXiv:2505.13378 [gr-qc].
  • [2] F. Pretorius, Evolution of binary black hole spacetimes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 121101 (2005), arXiv:grqc/0507014.
  • [3] M. Campanelli, C. O. Lousto, P. Marronetti, and Y. Zlochower, Accurate evolutions of orbiting black-hole binaries without excision, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 111101 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0511048.
  • [4] J. G. Baker, J. Centrella, D.-I. Choi, M. Koppitz, and J. van Meter, Gravitational wave extraction from an inspiraling configuration of merging black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 111102 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0511103.
  • [5] M. Alcubierre, Introduction to 3+1 numerical relativity, International series of monographs on physics (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2008).
  • [6] C. Bona, C. Palenzuela-Luque, and C. Bona-Casas, Elements of Numerical Relativity and Relativistic Hydrodynamics: From Einstein’s Equations to Astrophysical Simulations, 2nd ed., Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 783 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2009).
  • [7] M. Shibata, Numerical Relativity (WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2015) https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/9692.
  • [8] T. W. Baumgarte and S. L. Shapiro, Numerical Relativity: Solving Einstein’s Equations on the Computer (Cambridge University Press, 2010).
  • [9] C. Palenzuela, Introduction to Numerical Relativity, Front. Astron. Space Sci. 7, 58 (2020), arXiv:2008.12931 [gr-qc].
  • [10] D. Hilditch, Solving the Einstein Equations Numerically (2025) arXiv:2405.06035 [gr-qc].
  • [11] M. W. Choptuik, Universality and scaling in gravitational collapse of a massless scalar field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 9 (1993).
  • [12] M. W. Choptuik, E. W. Hirschmann, S. L. Liebling, and F. Pretorius, Critical collapse of the massless scalar field in axisymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 68, 044007 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0305003.
  • [13] C. Gundlach, D. Hilditch, and J. M. Martín-García, Critical Phenomena in Gravitational Collapse, (2025), arXiv:2507.07636 [gr-qc].
  • [14] J. Centrella, J. G. Baker, B. J. Kelly, and J. R. van Meter, Black-hole binaries, gravitational waves, and numerical relativity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3069 (2010), arXiv:1010.5260 [gr-qc].
  • [15] L. Lehner and F. Pretorius, Numerical Relativity and Astrophysics, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 52, 661 (2014), arXiv:1405.4840 [astro-ph.HE].
  • [16] C. Bambi, Y. Mizuno, S. Shashank, and F. Yuan, eds., New Frontiers in GRMHD Simulations, Springer Series in Astrophysics and Cosmology (Springer, 2025).
  • [16] C. Bambi, Y. Mizuno, S. Shashank, and F. Yuan, eds., New Frontiers in GRMHD Simulations, Springer Series in Astrophysics and Cosmology (Springer, 2025).
  • [17] Y. Foures-Bruhat, Theoreme d’existence pour certains systemes derivees partielles non lineaires, Acta Mat. 88, 141 (1952).
  • [18] Y. Choquet-Bruhat and R. P. Geroch, Global aspects of the Cauchy problem in general relativity, Commun. Math. Phys. 14, 329 (1969).
  • [19] J. Sbierski, On the Existence of a Maximal Cauchy Development for the Einstein Equations: a Dezornification, Annales Henri Poincare 17, 301 (2016), arXiv:1309.7591 [gr-qc].
  • [20] A. D. Rendall, Theorems on existence and global dynamics for the Einstein equations, Living Rev. Rel. 8, 6 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0505133.
  • [21] O. Sarbach and M. Tiglio, Continuum and Discrete Initial-Boundary-Value Problems and Einstein’s Field Equations, Living Rev. Rel. 15, 9 (2012), arXiv:1203.6443 [gr-qc].
  • [22] J. Isenberg, The Initial Value Problem in General Relativity, in Springer Handbook of Spacetime, edited by A. Ashtekar and V. Petkov (2014) pp. 303–321, arXiv:1304.1960 [gr-qc].
  • [23] J. HADAMARD, Sur les problemes aux derivees partielles et leur signification physique, Princeton university bulletin , 49 (1902).
  • [24] R. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041039 (2023), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc].
  • [25] B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GWTC1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031040 (2019), arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE].
  • [26] R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021053 (2021), arXiv:2010.14527 [grqc].
  • [27] R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, VIRGO), GWTC-2.1: Deep extended catalog of compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run, Phys. Rev. D 109, 022001 (2024), arXiv:2108.01045 [gr-qc].
  • [28] E. Berti et al., Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations, Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 243001 (2015), arXiv:1501.07274 [gr-qc].
  • [29] S. Endlich, V. Gorbenko, J. Huang, and L. Senatore, An effective formalism for testing extensions to General Relativity with gravitational waves, JHEP 09, 122, arXiv:1704.01590 [gr-qc].
  • [30] L. Barack et al., Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap, Class. Quant. Grav. 36, 143001 (2019), arXiv:1806.05195 [gr-qc].
  • [31] R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3, Phys. Rev. D 112, 084080 (2025), arXiv:2112.06861 [gr-qc].
  • [32] K. G. Arun et al. (LISA), New horizons for fundamental physics with LISA, Living Rev. Rel. 25, 4 (2022), arXiv:2205.01597 [gr-qc].
  • [33] M. Colpi et al. (LISA), LISA Definition Study Report, (2024), arXiv:2402.07571 [astro-ph.CO].
  • [34] N. Yunes, X. Siemens, and K. Yagi, GravitationalWave Tests of General Relativity with GroundBased Detectors and Pulsar-Timing Arrays, (2024), arXiv:2408.05240 [gr-qc].
  • [35] A. Abac et al. (ET), The Science of the Einstein Telescope, (2025), arXiv:2503.12263 [gr-qc].
  • [36] E. Barausse et al., Prospects for Fundamental Physics with LISA, Gen. Rel. Grav. 52, 81 (2020), arXiv:2001.09793 [gr-qc].
  • [37] S. Capozziello and M. De Laurentis, Extended Theories of Gravity, Phys. Rept. 509, 167 (2011), arXiv:1108.6266 [gr-qc].
  • [38] C. P. Burgess, Quantum gravity in everyday life: General relativity as an effective field theory, Living Rev. Rel. 7, 5 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0311082.
  • [39] T. Kobayashi, Horndeski theory and beyond: a review, Rept. Prog. Phys. 82, 086901 (2019), arXiv:1901.07183 [gr-qc].
  • [40] T. Padmanabhan and D. Kothawala, Lanczos-Lovelock models of gravity, Phys. Rept. 531, 115 (2013), arXiv:1302.2151 [gr-qc].
  • [41] T. P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni, f(R) Theories Of Gravity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 451 (2010), arXiv:0805.1726 [grqc].
  • [42] T. Clifton, P. G. Ferreira, A. Padilla, and C. Skordis, Modified Gravity and Cosmology, Phys. Rept. 513, 1 (2012), arXiv:1106.2476 [astro-ph.CO].
  • [43] E. Barausse, C. Palenzuela, M. Ponce, and L. Lehner, Neutron-star mergers in scalar-tensor theories of gravity, Phys. Rev. D 87, 081506 (2013), arXiv:1212.5053 [gr-qc].
  • [44] C. Palenzuela, E. Barausse, M. Ponce, and L. Lehner, Dynamical scalarization of neutron stars in scalartensor gravity theories, Phys. Rev. D 89, 044024 (2014), arXiv:1310.4481 [gr-qc].
  • [45] J. L. Ripley and F. Pretorius, Hyperbolicity in Spherical Gravitational Collapse in a Horndeski Theory, Phys. Rev. D 99, 084014 (2019), arXiv:1902.01468 [gr-qc].
  • [46] J. L. Ripley, Numerical relativity for Horndeski gravity, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 31, 2230017 (2022), arXiv:2207.13074 [gr-qc].
  • [47] M. Bezares, M. Crisostomi, C. Palenzuela, and E. Barausse, K-dynamics: well-posed 1+1 evolutions in Kessence, JCAP 03, 072, arXiv:2008.07546 [gr-qc].
  • [48] L. Bernard, L. Lehner, and R. Luna, Challenges to global solutions in Horndeski’s theory, Phys. Rev. D 100, 024011 (2019), arXiv:1904.12866 [gr-qc].
  • [49] L. Aresté Saló, K. Clough, and P. Figueras, WellPosedness of the Four-Derivative Scalar-Tensor Theory of Gravity in Singularity Avoiding Coordinates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 261104 (2022), arXiv:2208.14470 [grqc].
  • [50] A. H. K. R, J. L. Ripley, and N. Yunes, Where and why does Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet theory break down?, Phys. Rev. D 107, 044044 (2023), arXiv:2211.08477 [grqc].
  • [51] J. Cayuso, N. Ortiz, and L. Lehner, Fixing extensions to general relativity in the nonlinear regime, Phys. Rev. D 96, 084043 (2017), arXiv:1706.07421 [gr-qc].
  • [52] R. Cayuso and L. Lehner, Nonlinear, noniterative treatment of EFT-motivated gravity, Phys. Rev. D 102, 084008 (2020), arXiv:2005.13720 [gr-qc].
  • [53] N. Franchini, M. Bezares, E. Barausse, and L. Lehner, Fixing the dynamical evolution in scalar-GaussBonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D 106, 064061 (2022), arXiv:2206.00014 [gr-qc].
  • [54] R. Cayuso, P. Figueras, T. França, and L. Lehner, SelfConsistent Modeling of Gravitational Theories beyond General Relativity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 111403 (2023), arXiv:2303.07246 [gr-qc].
  • [55] G. Lara, M. Bezares, and E. Barausse, UV completions, fixing the equations, and nonlinearities in k-essence, Phys. Rev. D 105, 064058 (2022), arXiv:2112.09186 [grqc].
  • [56] F. Thaalba, M. Bezares, N. Franchini, and T. P. Sotiriou, Spherical collapse in scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity: Taming ill-posedness with a Ricci coupling, Phys. Rev. D 109, L041503 (2024), arXiv:2306.01695 [gr-qc].
  • [57] F. Thaalba, N. Franchini, M. Bezares, and T. P. Sotiriou, Hyperbolicity in scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity: A gauge invariant study for spherical evolution, Phys. Rev. D 111, 024053 (2025), arXiv:2410.16264 [gr-qc].
  • [58] M. Gerhardinger, J. T. Giblin, Jr., A. J. Tolley, and M. Trodden, Well-posed UV completion for simulating scalar Galileons, Phys. Rev. D 106, 043522 (2022), arXiv:2205.05697 [hep-th].
  • [59] C. de Rham, J. Kożuszek, A. J. Tolley, and T. Wiseman, Dynamical formulation of ghost-free massive gravity, Phys. Rev. D 108, 084052 (2023), arXiv:2302.04876 [hep-th].
  • [60] D. D. Doneva, L. Aresté Saló, K. Clough, P. Figueras, and S. S. Yazadjiev, Testing the limits of scalar-GaussBonnet gravity through nonlinear evolutions of spininduced scalarization, Phys. Rev. D 108, 084017 (2023), arXiv:2307.06474 [gr-qc].
  • [61] F. Corelli, P. Pani, and A. P. Sanna, Gravity with higher-curvature terms and second-order field equations: f(R) meets Gauss-Bonnet, Phys. Rev. D 112, 124055 (2025), arXiv:2510.17965 [gr-qc].
  • [62] H. L. H. Shum, L. Aresté Saló, F. Thaalba, M. Bezares, and T. P. Sotiriou, Well-posed BSSN-type formulation for scalar-tensor theories of gravity with secondorder field equations, Phys. Rev. D 113, 104001 (2026), arXiv:2512.11034 [gr-qc].
  • [63] G. Papallo and H. S. Reall, On the local well-posedness of Lovelock and Horndeski theories, Phys. Rev. D 96, 044019 (2017), arXiv:1705.04370 [gr-qc].
  • [64] G. Papallo, On the hyperbolicity of the most general Horndeski theory, Phys. Rev. D 96, 124036 (2017), arXiv:1710.10155 [gr-qc].
  • [65] Á. D. Kovács and H. S. Reall, Well-posed formulation of Lovelock and Horndeski theories, Phys. Rev. D 101, 124003 (2020), arXiv:2003.08398 [gr-qc].
  • [66] J. Kożuszek and T. Wiseman, Well-posedness of minimal dRGT massive gravity, JHEP 06, 133, arXiv:2410.19491 [hep-th].
  • [67] P. G. LeFloch and Y. Ma, Mathematical Validity of the f(R) Theory of Modified Gravity, (2014), arXiv:1412.8151 [math.AP].
  • [68] P. G. LeFloch and F. C. Mena, A first-order formulation of f(R) gravity in spherical symmetry, (2025), arXiv:2512.06908 [gr-qc].
  • [69] P. Luz and F. C. Mena, Local well-posedness of the initial value problem in Einstein–Cartan theory, Class. Quant. Grav. 42, 215011 (2025), arXiv:2505.22590 [grqc].
  • [70] P. Figueras, A. Held, and Á. D. Kovács, Well-posed initial value formulation of general effective field theories of gravity, (2024), arXiv:2407.08775 [gr-qc].
  • [71] C. P. Burgess, Introduction to Effective Field Theory, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 57, 329 (2007), arXiv:hepth/0701053.
  • [72] J. F. Donoghue, General relativity as an effective field theory: The leading quantum corrections, Phys. Rev. D 50, 3874 (1994), arXiv:gr-qc/9405057.
  • [73] K. S. Stelle, Renormalization of Higher Derivative Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 16, 953 (1977).
  • [74] D. R. Noakes, THE INITIAL VALUE FORMULATION OF HIGHER DERIVATIVE GRAVITY, J. Math. Phys. 24, 1846 (1983).
  • [75] G. W. Horndeski, Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 10, 363 (1974).
  • [76] S. Weinberg, Effective Field Theory for Inflation, Phys. Rev. D 77, 123541 (2008), arXiv:0804.4291 [hep-th].
  • [77] C. Deffayet, S. Deser, and G. Esposito-Farese, Generalized Galileons: All scalar models whose curved background extensions maintain second-order field equations and stress-tensors, Phys. Rev. D 80, 064015 (2009), arXiv:0906.1967 [gr-qc].
  • [78] H. S. Reall, Causality in gravitational theories with second order equations of motion, Phys. Rev. D 103, 084027 (2021), arXiv:2101.11623 [gr-qc].
  • [79] N. Tanahashi and S. Ohashi, Wave propagation and shock formation in the most general scalar–tensor theories, Class. Quant. Grav. 34, 215003 (2017), arXiv:1704.02757 [hep-th].
  • [80] H. S. Reall, N. Tanahashi, and B. Way, Shock Formation in Lovelock Theories, Phys. Rev. D 91, 044013 (2015), arXiv:1409.3874 [hep-th].
  • [81] H.-O. Kreiss and J. Lorenz, Initial-Boundary Value Problems and the Navier-Stokes Equations (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2004) https://epubs.siam.org/doi/pdf/10.1137/1.9780898719130.
  • [82] D. Hilditch, An Introduction to Well-posedness and Free-evolution, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28, 1340015 (2013), arXiv:1309.2012 [gr-qc].
  • [83] F. Abalos, A necessary condition for strong hyperbolicity of general first order systems, J. Hyperbol. Diff. Equat. 16, 193 (2019), arXiv:1707.05011 [gr-qc].
  • [84] F. Abalos and O. Reula, On necessary and sufficient conditions for strong hyperbolicity in systems with constraints, Class. Quant. Grav. 37, 185012 (2020), arXiv:1811.05558 [gr-qc].
  • [85] J. F. Abalos, On constraint preservation and strong hyperbolicity, Class. Quant. Grav. 39, 215004 (2022), arXiv:2111.06295 [math.AP].
  • [86] F. Abalos, O. Reula, and D. Hilditch, Hyperbolic extensions of constrained PDEs, Front. in Phys. 12, 1517192 (2024), arXiv:2410.18286 [math.AP].
  • [87] F. Abalos and D. Hilditch, Strong Hyperbolicity of Second-Order PDEs via Matrix Pencils, (2026), arXiv:2602.13223 [math.AP].
  • [88] T. W. Baumgarte and S. L. Shapiro, On the numerical integration of Einstein’s field equations, Phys. Rev. D 59, 024007 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9810065.
  • [89] T. Nakamura, K. Oohara, and Y. Kojima, General Relativistic Collapse to Black Holes and Gravitational Waves from Black Holes, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 90, 1 (1987).
  • [90] D. Alic, C. Bona-Casas, C. Bona, L. Rezzolla, and C. Palenzuela, Conformal and covariant formulation of the Z4 system with constraint-violation damping, Phys. Rev. D 85, 064040 (2012), arXiv:1106.2254 [gr-qc].
  • [91] D. Christodoulou, Mathematical problems of general relativity I, Vol. 1 (European Mathematical Society, 2008).
  • [92] D. D. Doneva, L. Aresté Saló, and S. S. Yazadjiev, 3+1 nonlinear evolution of Ricci-coupled scalar-GaussBonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D 110, 024040 (2024), arXiv:2404.15526 [gr-qc].
  • [93] E. Gourgoulhon, 3+1 Formalism in General Relativity: Bases of Numerical Relativity, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 846 (Springer, 2012).
  • [94] R. P. Geroch, Partial differential equations of physics, in 46th Scottish Universities Summer School in Physics: General Relativity (1996) arXiv:gr-qc/9602055.
  • [95] O. A. Reula, Hyperbolic methods for Einstein’s equations, Living Rev. Rel. 1, 3 (1998).
  • [96] S. Frittelli, Potential for ill-posedness in several secondorder formulations of the einstein equations, Phys. Rev. D 70, 044029 (2004).
  • [97] S. Frittelli and R. Gomez, Ill posedness in the Einstein equations, J. Math. Phys. 41, 5535 (2000), arXiv:grqc/0006082.
  • [98] H.-a. Shinkai, Formulations of the Einstein equations for numerical simulations, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 54, 2513 (2009), arXiv:0805.0068 [gr-qc].
  • [99] N. H. Barth and S. M. Christensen, Quantizing fourthorder gravity theories: The functional integral, Phys. Rev. D 28, 1876 (1983).
  • [100] B. Whitt, Stability of schwarzschild black holes in fourth-order gravity, Phys. Rev. D 32, 379 (1985).
  • [101] K. S. Stelle, Renormalization of higher-derivative quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 16, 953 (1977).
  • [102] K. S. Stelle, Classical gravity with higher derivatives., General Relativity and Gravitation 9, 353 (1978).
  • [103] A. Held and H. Lim, Nonlinear evolution of quadratic gravity in 3+1 dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 108, 104025 (2023), arXiv:2306.04725 [gr-qc].
  • [104] A. Held and H. Lim, Black-hole binaries and waveforms in Quadratic Gravity, (2025), arXiv:2503.13428 [gr-qc].
  • [105] J. Carminati and R. G. McLenaghan, Algebraic invariants of the Riemann tensor in a four-dimensional Lorentzian space, J. Math. Phys. 32, 3135 (1991).
  • [106] S. A. Fulling, R. C. King, B. G. Wybourne, and C. J. Cummins, Normal forms for tensor polynomials. 1: The Riemann tensor, Class. Quant. Grav. 9, 1151 (1992).
  • [107] P. Figueras, Á. D. Kovács, and S. Yao, Stable non-linear evolution in regularised higher derivative effective field theories, JHEP 10, 150, arXiv:2505.00082 [hep-th].
  • [108] T. Giannakopoulos, N. T. Bishop, D. Hilditch, D. Pollney, and M. Zilhão, Numerical convergence of model Cauchy-characteristic extraction and matching, Phys. Rev. D 108, 104033 (2023), arXiv:2306.13010 [gr-qc].
  • [109] C. Gundlach, Simulations of gravitational collapse in null coordinates. III. Hyperbolicity, Phys. Rev. D 110, 024020 (2024), arXiv:2404.16720 [gr-qc].
  • [110] A. Besharat, L. Lehner, and J. Radkovski, Fixing EFT equations with a reservoir model, (2026), arXiv:2602.13431 [hep-th].