IndIGO-D: Probing Compact Binary Coalescences in the Decihertz GW Band

Author(s)

Sharma, Abhishek, Tahelyani, Divya, Sengupta, Anand S., Mitra, Sanjit

Abstract

We study IndIGO-D, a decihertz gravitational-wave mission concept, focusing on a specific configuration in which three spacecraft fly in formation to form an L-shaped interferometer in a heliocentric orbit. The two orthogonal arms share a common vertex, providing a space-based analogue of terrestrial Michelson detectors, while operating in an optimised configuration that yields ppm-level arm-length stability. Assuming 1000 km arm length, we analyse the orbital motion and antenna response, and assess sensitivity across the [0.1 - 10] Hz band bridging LISA and next-generation ground-based interferometers. Using fiducial sensitivity curves provided by the IndIGO-D collaboration, we compute horizon distances for different source classes. Intermediate-mass black-hole binaries with masses $10^{2}$ - $10^{3} \, M_\odot$ are detectable to redshifts $z \sim 10^{3}$, complementing the reach of LISA and terrestrial detectors. Binary neutron star systems are observable to a horizon distance of $z \lesssim 0.3$, allowing continuous multi-band coverage with Voyager-class interferometers from the decihertz regime to merger. A Bayesian parameter-estimation study of a GW170817-like binary shows that the sky localization area improves from $\sim 21 \,\mathrm{deg}^2$ at one month to $0.3 \,\mathrm{deg}^2$ at six hours pre-merger! These sky areas are readily tiled by wide-field time-domain telescopes such as the Rubin Observatory, whose $9.6 \,\mathrm{deg}^2$ field of view and r-band depth enable high-cadence, repeated coverage of GW170817-like kilonovae at this distance and beyond. IndIGO-D exploits the rapid evolution of binaries in the decihertz band to bridge the gap between millihertz and terrestrial observations, enabling early warnings on timescales from months to hours and enhancing the prospects for multi-band and multi-messenger discoveries.

Figures

The orbits of the three spacecraft constituting IndIGO-D. The spacecraft 1 at the vertex orbits the Sun in ecliptic plane at a distance of 1 AU, while the orbits of spacecraft 2 and 3 are inclined by $60^\circ$ with respect to ecliptic which results in the most stable flight configuration such that the inter spacecraft separation remain nearly constant throughout the motion.
Caption The orbits of the three spacecraft constituting IndIGO-D. The spacecraft 1 at the vertex orbits the Sun in ecliptic plane at a distance of 1 AU, while the orbits of spacecraft 2 and 3 are inclined by $60^\circ$ with respect to ecliptic which results in the most stable flight configuration such that the inter spacecraft separation remain nearly constant throughout the motion.
Flexing of the arms: fractional variation of the inter-spacecraft separation (computed using the approximated orbits described by \cref{Eq:anomaly_relation_approximated}) along the two arms over one orbital period of the constellation. The separation varies by ${\sim 7.5\,\mathrm{m}}$ over a drift timescale ${t_{\rm drift} \sim \mathcal{O}(\mathrm{months})}$ within a single orbital period.
Caption Flexing of the arms: fractional variation of the inter-spacecraft separation (computed using the approximated orbits described by \cref{Eq:anomaly_relation_approximated}) along the two arms over one orbital period of the constellation. The separation varies by ${\sim 7.5\,\mathrm{m}}$ over a drift timescale ${t_{\rm drift} \sim \mathcal{O}(\mathrm{months})}$ within a single orbital period.
Variation in the magnitude of the antenna pattern functions across the whole sky in nearly one orbital period of the spacecraft constellation, assuming long-wavelength limit. Grids in the sky-map correspond to the ecliptic longitude and ecliptic latitude that marks the position in the sky in the SSB frame. Note that at any instant there exists 4 blind and 2 bright spots where the magnitude of antenna patterns are 0 and 1, respectively. The 4 blind spots lie in the detector's plane along the lines making an angle of $45^\circ$ with the detector's arms. The 2 bright spots lie perpendicular to the detector's plane, above and below the detector.
Caption Variation in the magnitude of the antenna pattern functions across the whole sky in nearly one orbital period of the spacecraft constellation, assuming long-wavelength limit. Grids in the sky-map correspond to the ecliptic longitude and ecliptic latitude that marks the position in the sky in the SSB frame. Note that at any instant there exists 4 blind and 2 bright spots where the magnitude of antenna patterns are 0 and 1, respectively. The 4 blind spots lie in the detector's plane along the lines making an angle of $45^\circ$ with the detector's arms. The 2 bright spots lie perpendicular to the detector's plane, above and below the detector.
 : Noise amplitude spectral density : Horizon distance
Caption : Noise amplitude spectral density : Horizon distance
 : Comparison of detector sensitivities and horizon distances. Note that IndIGO-D is sensitive to binary neutron star systems out to a horizon distance of $\sim 1000$ Mpc, similar to LIGO-Voyager~\cite{Adhikari2018Voyager}. \\ (a) Noise sensitivities: Detector noise amplitude spectral densities (ASD) for various detectors, along with the ASD of the GW170817- and GW150914-like GW signals, given by $2\sqrt{f}\tilde h(f)$. The red-filled circles represent the time before the merger at a specific GW frequency.\\ (b) Horizon distance (right axis) and corresponding redshift (left axis) as functions of source-frame total mass for equal-mass compact binaries. Detection distances are evaluated for 48 uniformly distributed sky positions, with the inclination angle fixed to zero (face-on). The upper solid line indicates the horizon distance, while the dark and light shaded bands indicate the distances enclosing $50\%$ and $90\%$ of sky locations, respectively. : Caption not extracted
Caption : Comparison of detector sensitivities and horizon distances. Note that IndIGO-D is sensitive to binary neutron star systems out to a horizon distance of $\sim 1000$ Mpc, similar to LIGO-Voyager~\cite{Adhikari2018Voyager}. \\ (a) Noise sensitivities: Detector noise amplitude spectral densities (ASD) for various detectors, along with the ASD of the GW170817- and GW150914-like GW signals, given by $2\sqrt{f}\tilde h(f)$. The red-filled circles represent the time before the merger at a specific GW frequency.\\ (b) Horizon distance (right axis) and corresponding redshift (left axis) as functions of source-frame total mass for equal-mass compact binaries. Detection distances are evaluated for 48 uniformly distributed sky positions, with the inclination angle fixed to zero (face-on). The upper solid line indicates the horizon distance, while the dark and light shaded bands indicate the distances enclosing $50\%$ and $90\%$ of sky locations, respectively. : Caption not extracted
Detection fractions (SNR $\geq 8$) for simulated merging binary neutron star systems with component masses $(1.4, 1.4)\, \msun$, isotropic orientations, and a population distributed uniformly in comoving volume out to ${z = 0.33}$. IndIGO-D and Voyager detect 17.72\% and 26.04\% of the sources, respectively. All sources detected by IndIGO-D will also be detected by Voyager. The overlap illustrates the multi-band science potential, in which IndIGO-D provides long-duration tracking and pre-merger localisation in the dHz band for events later observed in the Voyager band.
Caption Detection fractions (SNR $\geq 8$) for simulated merging binary neutron star systems with component masses $(1.4, 1.4)\, \msun$, isotropic orientations, and a population distributed uniformly in comoving volume out to ${z = 0.33}$. IndIGO-D and Voyager detect 17.72\% and 26.04\% of the sources, respectively. All sources detected by IndIGO-D will also be detected by Voyager. The overlap illustrates the multi-band science potential, in which IndIGO-D provides long-duration tracking and pre-merger localisation in the dHz band for events later observed in the Voyager band.
Sky-localization area (90\% credible interval) for a GW170817-like binary neutron star at different pre-merger epochs in simulated IndIGO-D data: one month, one week, one day, and six hours before merger. For comparison, we also show the localization obtained with ET at six hours before merger and the post-merger localization with the AHLV network at design sensitivity. For reference, the localization patch for the real GW170817 event observed by the HLV network during the O3 run is included. The ET sky posterior is bimodal; only the dominant mode is shown, with the secondary mode located on the opposite side of the sky. The corresponding epochs are indicated on the time–frequency track of the binary, which is colored by the accumulated signal-to-noise ratio over the three-month in-band evolution in IndIGO-D up to $30\,\si{\hertz}$.
Caption Sky-localization area (90\% credible interval) for a GW170817-like binary neutron star at different pre-merger epochs in simulated IndIGO-D data: one month, one week, one day, and six hours before merger. For comparison, we also show the localization obtained with ET at six hours before merger and the post-merger localization with the AHLV network at design sensitivity. For reference, the localization patch for the real GW170817 event observed by the HLV network during the O3 run is included. The ET sky posterior is bimodal; only the dominant mode is shown, with the secondary mode located on the opposite side of the sky. The corresponding epochs are indicated on the time–frequency track of the binary, which is colored by the accumulated signal-to-noise ratio over the three-month in-band evolution in IndIGO-D up to $30\,\si{\hertz}$.
Comparison of two-dimensional marginalized posterior distributions in chirp mass and mass ratio for a GW170817-like system, obtained from simulated IndIGO-D data at different epochs before merger, as indicated in the legend. The contours show the 90\% credible regions, with colours matching those of the IndIGO-D early-warning skymaps in~\cref{fig:skymaps}. As expected, parameter inference becomes progressively more accurate as the signal accumulates in-band. These results can be directly compared with the corresponding sky-localization performance shown in \cref{fig:skymaps}.
Caption Comparison of two-dimensional marginalized posterior distributions in chirp mass and mass ratio for a GW170817-like system, obtained from simulated IndIGO-D data at different epochs before merger, as indicated in the legend. The contours show the 90\% credible regions, with colours matching those of the IndIGO-D early-warning skymaps in~\cref{fig:skymaps}. As expected, parameter inference becomes progressively more accurate as the signal accumulates in-band. These results can be directly compared with the corresponding sky-localization performance shown in \cref{fig:skymaps}.
Comparison of the antenna pattern functions corresponding to the two polarizations, with and without assuming the LWL, evaluated in the frequency domain for a GW170817 like system as a function of frequency. Consideration of finite detector size effects results in complex valued $F_{+,\times}$. The top and bottom panels correspond to the real and imaginary parts of $F_{+,\times}$. The modulation in the lower end of the frequency spectrum corresponds to the changing orientation and position of the detector as the binary radiates for a longer period of time in the lower frequency regime. As the inspiral rate increases, the time-dependent effects get suppressed and the antenna pattern functions become nearly constant in LWL (dashed dark blue curve). However, consideration of finite detector size effects results in modulated $F_{+,\times}$ at the higher end of the frequency spectrum (solid light blue curve).
Caption Comparison of the antenna pattern functions corresponding to the two polarizations, with and without assuming the LWL, evaluated in the frequency domain for a GW170817 like system as a function of frequency. Consideration of finite detector size effects results in complex valued $F_{+,\times}$. The top and bottom panels correspond to the real and imaginary parts of $F_{+,\times}$. The modulation in the lower end of the frequency spectrum corresponds to the changing orientation and position of the detector as the binary radiates for a longer period of time in the lower frequency regime. As the inspiral rate increases, the time-dependent effects get suppressed and the antenna pattern functions become nearly constant in LWL (dashed dark blue curve). However, consideration of finite detector size effects results in modulated $F_{+,\times}$ at the higher end of the frequency spectrum (solid light blue curve).
References
  • [1] B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc].
  • [2] B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Properties of the Binary Black Hole Merger GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 241102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03840 [gr-qc].
  • [3] B. Abbott et al. (The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs, Physical Review X 9, 10.1103/physrevx.9.031040 (2019).
  • [4] R. Abbott et al. (The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration), GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First Half of the Third Observing Run, Physical Review X 11, 10.1103/physrevx.11.021053 (2021).
  • [5] R. Abbott et al. (The LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration), GWTC-2.1: Deep extended catalog of compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run, Phys. Rev. D 109, 022001 (2024).
  • [6] R. Abbott et al. (The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collaboration), GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041039 (2023).
  • [7] A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), GWTC-4.0: An Introduction to Version 4.0 of the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog, (2025), arXiv:2508.18080 [gr-qc].
  • [8] A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run, (2025), arXiv:2508.18082 [gr-qc].
  • [9] B. P. Abbott et al. (The LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017).
  • [10] B. P. Abbott et al., Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger, Astrophys. J. Lett. 848, L12 (2017), arXiv:1710.05833 [astro-ph.HE].
  • [11] B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, 1M2H, Dark Energy Camera GW-E, DES, DLT40, Las Cumbres Observatory, VINROUGE, MASTER), A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant, Nature 551, 85 (2017), arXiv:1710.05835 [astro-ph.CO].
  • [12] D. Kasen, B. Metzger, J. Barnes, E. Quataert, and E. Ramirez-Ruiz, Origin of the heavy elements in binary neutron-star mergers from a gravitational wave event, Nature 551, 80 (2017), arXiv:1710.05463 [astro-ph.HE].
  • [13] B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi-GBM, INTEGRAL), Gravitational Waves and Gamma-rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A, Astrophys. J. Lett. 848, L13 (2017), arXiv:1710.05834 [astro-ph.HE].
  • [14] A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), GWTC-4.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries, (2025), arXiv:2508.18083 [astro-ph.HE].
  • [15] J. Aasi et al. (LIGO Scientific), Advanced LIGO, Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc].
  • [16] P. Amaro-Seoane et al. (LISA), Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM].
  • [17] I. Mandel, A. Sesana, and A. Vecchio, The astrophysical science case for a decihertz gravitational-wave detector, Class. Quant. Grav. 35, 054004 (2018), arXiv:1710.11187 [astro-ph.HE].
  • [18] K. A. Kuns, H. Yu, Y. Chen, and R. X. Adhikari, Astrophysics and cosmology with a decihertz gravitational-wave detector: TianGO, Phys. Rev. D 102, 043001 (2020), arXiv:1908.06004 [gr-qc].
  • [19] M. A. Sedda et al., The missing link in gravitational-wave astronomy: discoveries waiting in the decihertz range, Class. Quant. Grav. 37, 215011 (2020), arXiv:1908.11375 [gr-qc].
  • [20] IndIGO – Indian Initiative in Gravitational-wave Observations, https://www.gw-indigo.org (2025), accessed: 2025-12-23.
  • [21] IndIGO-D Collaboration, Science Cases and Mission Concept for a Michelson-like Deci-Hertz Space-Based Gravitational-Wave Observatory (2026), manuscript in preparation.
  • [22] S. Kawamura et al., The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO, Class. Quant. Grav. 23, S125 (2006).
  • [23] S. Sato et al., The status of DECIGO, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 840, 012010 (2017).
  • [24] S. Kawamura et al., Current status of space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO and B-DECIGO, PTEP 2021, 05A105 (2021), arXiv:2006.13545 [gr-qc].
  • [25] J. Harms et al. (LGWA), Lunar Gravitational-wave Antenna, Astrophys. J. 910, 1 (2021), arXiv:2010.13726 [gr-qc].
  • [26] P. Ajith et al., The Lunar Gravitational-wave Antenna: mission studies and science case, JCAP 01, 108, arXiv:2404.09181 [gr-qc].
  • [27] A. B. Yelikar and K. Jani, Binary Neutron Stars from the Moon: Early Warnings and Precision Science for the Artemis Era, (2025), arXiv:2510.05400 [gr-qc].
  • [28] K. Jani et al., Laser Interferometer Lunar Antenna (LILA): Advancing the U.S. Priorities in Gravitationalwave and Lunar Science, (2025), arXiv:2508.11631 [gr-qc].
  • [29] T. Creighton, P. Lognonné, M. P. Panning, J. Trippe, V. Quetschke, and K. Jani, Fundamental Noise and Gravitational-Wave Sensitivity of the Laser Interferometer Lunar Antenna (LILA), (2025), arXiv:2508.18437 [gr-qc].
  • [30] S. V. Dhurandhar, K. Rajesh Nayak, S. Koshti, and J. Y. Vinet, Fundamentals of the LISA stable flight formation, Class. Quant. Grav. 22, 481 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0410093.
  • [31] L. Sun, E. Goetz, J. S. Kissel, et al., Characterization of systematic error in Advanced LIGO calibration, Classical and Quantum Gravity 37, 225008 (2020).
  • [32] R. Gamba, M. Breschi, S. Bernuzzi, M. Agathos, and A. Nagar, Waveform systematics in the gravitational-wave inference of tidal parameters and equation of state from binary neutron-star signals, Phys. Rev. D 103, 124015 (2021).
  • [33] E. Savalle, J. Gair, L. Speri, and S. Babak, Assessing the impact of instrumental calibration uncertainty on lisa science, Phys. Rev. D 106, 022003 (2022).
  • [34] R. X. Adhikari, N. Smith, A. Brooks, L. Barsotti, B. Shapiro, B. Lantz, D. McClelland, E. K. Gustafson, D. V. Martynov, V. Mitrofanov, D. Coyne, K. Arai, C. Torrie, and C. Wipf, LIGO Voyager Upgrade: Design Concept, Technical Report No. LIGO-T1400226 (2018).
  • [35] IndIGO-D Collaboration, IndIGO: Decihertz gravitational–wave observatory repository, https://gitlab. com/rajesh.nayak/indigo (2024), accessed: 2026-01-06.
  • [36] S. Khan, S. Husa, M. Hannam, F. Ohme, M. Pürrer, X. Jiménez Forteza, and A. Bohé, Frequency-domain gravitational waves from nonprecessing black-hole binaries. II. A phenomenological model for the advanced detector era, Phys. Rev. D 93, 044007 (2016), arXiv:1508.07253 [gr-qc].
  • [37] N. Aghanim et al. (Planck), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO].
  • [37] N. Aghanim et al. (Planck), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO].
  • [38] D. Shoemaker (LIGO Scientific), Gravitational wave astronomy with LIGO and similar detectors in the next decade, (2019), arXiv:1904.03187 [gr-qc].
  • [39] A. Sesana, J. Gair, I. Mandel, and A. Vecchio, Observing gravitational waves from the first generation of black holes, Astrophys. J. Lett. 698, L129 (2009), arXiv:0903.4177 [astro-ph.CO].
  • [40] J. Bellovary, A. Brooks, M. Colpi, M. Eracleous, K. Holley-Bockelmann, A. Hornschemeier, L. Mayer, P. Natarajan, J. Slutsky, and M. Tremmel, Where are the Intermediate Mass Black Holes?, (2019), arXiv:1903.08144 [astro-ph.HE].
  • [41] P. Gondolo and J. Silk, Dark matter annihilation at the galactic center, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1719 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9906391.
  • [42] P. Ullio, H. Zhao, and M. Kamionkowski, A Dark matter spike at the galactic center?, Phys. Rev. D 64, 043504 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0101481.
  • [43] L. Sadeghian, F. Ferrer, and C. M. Will, Dark matter distributions around massive black holes: A general relativistic analysis, Phys. Rev. D 88, 063522 (2013), arXiv:1305.2619 [astro-ph.GA].
  • [44] A. M. Green and B. J. Kavanagh, Primordial Black Holes as a dark matter candidate, J. Phys. G 48, 043001 (2021), arXiv:2007.10722 [astro-ph.CO].
  • [45] M. Boudaud, T. Lacroix, M. Stref, J. Lavalle, and P. Salati, In-depth analysis of the clustering of dark matter particles around primordial black holes. Part I. Density profiles, JCAP 08, 053, arXiv:2106.07480 [astro-ph.CO].
  • [46] E. Barausse, V. Cardoso, and P. Pani, Can environmental effects spoil precision gravitational-wave astrophysics?, Phys. Rev. D 89, 104059 (2014), arXiv:1404.7149 [gr-qc].
  • [47] K. Eda, Y. Itoh, S. Kuroyanagi, and J. Silk, New Probe of Dark-Matter Properties: Gravitational Waves from an Intermediate-Mass Black Hole Embedded in a DarkMatter Minispike, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 221101 (2013), arXiv:1301.5971 [gr-qc].
  • [48] K. Eda, Y. Itoh, S. Kuroyanagi, and J. Silk, Gravitational waves as a probe of dark matter minispikes, Phys. Rev. D 91, 044045 (2015), arXiv:1408.3534 [gr-qc].
  • [49] C. F. B. Macedo, P. Pani, V. Cardoso, and L. C. B. Crispino, Into the lair: gravitational-wave signatures of dark matter, Astrophys. J. 774, 48 (2013), arXiv:1302.2646 [gr-qc].
  • [50] B. J. Kavanagh, D. A. Nichols, G. Bertone, and D. Gaggero, Detecting dark matter around black holes with gravitational waves: Effects of dark-matter dynamics on the gravitational waveform, Phys. Rev. D 102, 083006 (2020), arXiv:2002.12811 [gr-qc].
  • [51] A. Coogan, G. Bertone, D. Gaggero, B. J. Kavanagh, and D. A. Nichols, Measuring the dark matter environments of black hole binaries with gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 105, 043009 (2022), arXiv:2108.04154 [gr-qc].
  • [52] A. M. Derdzinski, D. D’Orazio, P. Duffell, Z. Haiman, and A. MacFadyen, Probing gas disc physics with LISA: simulations of an intermediate mass ratio inspiral in an accretion disc, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 486, 2754 (2019), [Erratum: Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 489, 4860– 4861 (2019)], arXiv:1810.03623 [astro-ph.HE].
  • [52] A. M. Derdzinski, D. D’Orazio, P. Duffell, Z. Haiman, and A. MacFadyen, Probing gas disc physics with LISA: simulations of an intermediate mass ratio inspiral in an accretion disc, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 486, 2754 (2019), [Erratum: Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 489, 4860– 4861 (2019)], arXiv:1810.03623 [astro-ph.HE].
  • [53] B. Kocsis, N. Yunes, and A. Loeb, Observable Signatures of EMRI Black Hole Binaries Embedded in Thin Accretion Disks, Phys. Rev. D 84, 024032 (2011), arXiv:1104.2322 [astro-ph.GA].
  • [54] D. Tahelyani, A. Bhattacharyya, and A. S. Sengupta, Probing dark matter halo profiles with multiband observations of gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 111, 083041 (2025), arXiv:2411.14063 [gr-qc].
  • [55] X. Chen and P. Amaro-Seoane, Revealing the formation of stellar-mass black hole binaries: The need for deci-Hertz gravitational wave observatories, Astrophys. J. Lett. 842, L2 (2017), arXiv:1702.08479 [astro-ph.HE].
  • [56] R. M. O’Leary, B. Kocsis, and A. Loeb, Gravitational waves from scattering of stellar-mass black holes in galactic nuclei, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 395, 2127 (2009), arXiv:0807.2638 [astro-ph].
  • [57] P. C. Peters and J. Mathews, Gravitational radiation from point masses in a Keplerian orbit, Phys. Rev. 131, 435 (1963).
  • [58] F. Antonini and H. B. Perets, Secular evolution of compact binaries near massive black holes: Gravitational wave sources and other exotica, Astrophys. J. 757, 27 (2012), arXiv:1203.2938 [astro-ph.GA].
  • [59] J. Samsing, M. MacLeod, and E. Ramirez-Ruiz, The Formation of Eccentric Compact Binary Inspirals and the Role of Gravitational Wave Emission in Binary-Single Stellar Encounters, Astrophys. J. 784, 71 (2014), arXiv:1308.2964 [astro-ph.HE].
  • [60] W. E. East, S. T. McWilliams, J. Levin, and F. Pretorius, Observing complete gravitational wave signals from dynamical capture binaries, Phys. Rev. D 87, 043004 (2013), arXiv:1212.0837 [gr-qc].
  • [61] H. Ziaeepour, Binary Neutron Star (BNS) Merger: What We Learned from Relativistic Ejecta of GW/GRB 170817A, MDPI Physics 1, 194 (2019), arXiv:1905.11355 [astro-ph.HE].
  • [62] J.-S. Wang, F.-K. Peng, K. Wu, and Z.-G. Dai, Premerger electromagnetic counterparts of binary compact stars, Astrophys. J. 868, 19 (2018), arXiv:1810.00170 [astro-ph.HE].
  • [63] B. Crinquand, B. Cerutti, and G. Dubus, Kinetic modeling of the electromagnetic precursor from an axisymmetric binary pulsar coalescence, Astron. Astrophys. 622, A161 (2019), arXiv:1812.05898 [astro-ph.HE].
  • [64] E. R. Most and A. A. Philippov, Electromagnetic precursors to gravitational wave events: Numerical simulations of flaring in pre-merger binary neutron star magnetospheres, Astrophys. J. Lett. 893, L6 (2020), arXiv:2001.06037 [astro-ph.HE].
  • [65] N. Sridhar, J. Zrake, B. D. Metzger, L. Sironi, and D. Giannios, Shock-powered radio precursors of neutron star mergers from accelerating relativistic binary winds, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 501, 3184 (2021), arXiv:2010.09214 [astro-ph.HE].
  • [66] E. R. Most and A. A. Philippov, Electromagnetic precursor flares from the late inspiral of neutron star binaries, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 515, 2710 (2022), arXiv:2205.09643 [astro-ph.HE].
  • [67] K. P. Mooley, A. T. Deller, O. Gottlieb, E. Nakar, G. Hallinan, S. Bourke, D. A. Frail, A. Horesh, A. Corsi, and K. Hotokezaka, Superluminal motion of a relativistic jet in the neutron-star merger GW170817, Nature 561, 355 (2018), arXiv:1806.09693 [astro-ph.HE].
  • [68] T. Dietrich et al., Matter imprints in waveform models for neutron star binaries: Tidal and self-spin effects, Phys. Rev. D 99, 024029 (2019), arXiv:1804.02235 [gr-qc].
  • [69] T. Dietrich, A. Samajdar, S. Khan, N. K. JohnsonMcDaniel, R. Dudi, and W. Tichy, Improving the NRTidal model for binary neutron star systems, Phys. Rev. D 100, 044003 (2019), arXiv:1905.06011 [gr-qc].
  • [70] I. M. Romero-Shaw et al., Bayesian inference for compact binary coalescences with BILBY: validation and application to the first LIGO–Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalogue, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 499, 3295 (2020), arXiv:2006.00714 [astro-ph.IM].
  • [71] N. J. Cornish, Fast Fisher Matrices and Lazy Likelihoods, arXiv preprint (2010), arXiv:1007.4820 [gr-qc].
  • [72] N. J. Cornish, Heterodyned likelihood for rapid gravitational wave parameter inference, Phys. Rev. D 104, 104054 (2021), arXiv:2109.02728 [gr-qc].
  • [73] B. Zackay, L. Dai, and T. Venumadhav, Relative Binning and Fast Likelihood Evaluation for Gravitational Wave Parameter Estimation, arXiv preprint (2018), arXiv:1806.08792 [astro-ph.IM].
  • [74] S. Nissanke, M. Kasliwal, and A. Georgieva, Identifying elusive electromagnetic counterparts to gravitational wave mergers: an end-to-end simulation, The Astrophysical Journal 767, 124 (2013), arXiv:1210.6362 [astro-ph.CO].
  • [75] W. B. Atwood et al. (Fermi-LAT), The Large Area Telescope on the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope Mission, Astrophys. J. 697, 1071 (2009), arXiv:0902.1089 [astro-ph.IM].
  • [76] Ž. Ivezić, S. M. Kahn, J. A. Tyson, B. Abel, E. Acosta, R. Allsman, D. Alonso, Y. AlSayyad, S. F. Anderson, J. Andrew, et al., LSST: From science drivers to reference design and anticipated data products, Astrophysical Journal 873, 111 (2019), arXiv:0805.2366.
  • [77] S. Valenti, D. J. Sand, S. Yang, E. Cappellaro, L. Tartaglia, A. Corsi, S. W. Jha, D. E. Reichart, J. Haislip, and V. Kouprianov, The discovery of the electromagnetic counterpart of GW170817: Kilonova AT 2017gfo/DLT17ck, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 848, L24 (2017), arXiv:1710.05854 [astro-ph.HE].
  • [78] B. Margalit and B. D. Metzger, The Multi-Messenger Matrix: the Future of Neutron Star Merger Constraints on the Nuclear Equation of State, Astrophys. J. Lett. 880, L15 (2019), arXiv:1904.11995 [astro-ph.HE].
  • [79] B. C. Seymour, H. Yu, and Y. Chen, Multiband gravitational wave cosmography with dark sirens, Phys. Rev. D 108, 044038 (2023), arXiv:2208.01668 [gr-qc].
  • [80] A. Sesana, Prospects for Multiband Gravitational-Wave Astronomy after GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 231102 (2016), arXiv:1602.06951 [gr-qc].
  • [81] A. Ghosh et al., Testing general relativity using golden black-hole binaries, Phys. Rev. D 94, 021101 (2016), arXiv:1602.02453 [gr-qc].
  • [82] E. Barausse, N. Yunes, and K. Chamberlain, TheoryAgnostic Constraints on Black-Hole Dipole Radiation with Multiband Gravitational-Wave Astrophysics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 241104 (2016), arXiv:1603.04075 [gr-qc].
  • [83] L. J. Rubbo, N. J. Cornish, and O. Poujade, Forward modeling of space borne gravitational wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D 69, 082003 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0311069.
  • [84] N. J. Cornish and K. Shuman, Black Hole Hunting with LISA, Phys. Rev. D 101, 124008 (2020), arXiv:2005.03610 [gr-qc].
  • [85] A. Sharma, A. S. Sengupta, and S. Mukherjee, Accelerated parameter estimation of supermassive black hole binaries in LISA using a meshfree approximation, Phys. Rev. D 111, 042009 (2025), arXiv:2409.14288 [gr-qc].
  • [86] J. D. E. Creighton and W. G. Anderson, GravitationalWave Physics and Astronomy: An Introduction to Theory, Experiment and Data Analysis (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2011).
  • [87] D. Foreman-Mackey, D. W. Hogg, D. Lang, and J. Goodman, emcee: The MCMC Hammer, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 125, 306 (2013).
  • [88] J. Skilling, Nested sampling for general Bayesian computation, Bayesian Anal. 1, 833 (2006).
  • [89] C. M. Biwer, C. D. Capano, S. De, M. Cabero, D. A. Brown, A. H. Nitz, and V. Raymond, PyCBC Inference: A Python-based parameter estimation toolkit for compact binary coalescence signals, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 131, 024503 (2019), arXiv:1807.10312 [astro-ph.IM].
  • [90] J. S. Speagle, dynesty: a dynamic nested sampling package for estimating Bayesian posteriors and evidences, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 493, 3132 (2020), arXiv:1904.02180 [astro-ph.IM].
  • [91] G. Ashton et al., BILBY: A user-friendly Bayesian inference library for gravitational-wave astronomy, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 241, 27 (2019), arXiv:1811.02042 [astro-ph.IM].