Observing binary neutron star subpopulations with the Einstein Telescope
Author(s)
Toubiana, Alexandre, Dvorkin, Irina
Abstract
The formation channels of binary neutron stars (BNSs) remain uncertain. The detection of GW190425 by LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA (LVK) suggests a subpopulation of massive BNSs, possibly formed through unstable "case BB" mass transfer with short merger delays. We investigate whether next-generation detectors such as the Einstein Telescope (ET) can identify and characterise such subpopulations. Using the latest LVK constraints on the BNS merger rate, we generate mock ET catalogues containing a mixture of light and heavy subpopulations. The redshift distribution of each subpopulation is modeled as the convolution of the cosmic star formation rate with a time-delay distribution: heavy BNSs have fixed short delays, while light BNSs follow power-law delays with indices -0.5,-1,-1.5. Hierarchical Bayesian analyses are then performed on catalogues of 100-5,000 events. With hundreds of detections from ET, we will be able to establish that the total mass distribution is bimodal. A few thousand events are sufficient to disentangle the redshift distributions of the two subpopulations for moderate time-delay indices (-0.5 or -1). For steeper indices (-1.5), the differences are more subtle, requiring larger catalogues, beyond what we could explore given our computational resources. Next-generation detectors should enable the detection of multiple BNS subpopulations and their redshift evolution, providing valuable insight into their formation pathways.
Figures
Caption
Merger rate of the long delays population (dashed lines), short delays population (dotted lines) and total population (full line) for three different hypothesis of the time-delays distribution. The rate is normalised at $z=0$ to the mean of the interval reported by the LVK following GWTC-4~\citep{LIGOScientific:2025pvj}. The gray band at $z=0$ shows the $90\%$ credible interval reported by the LVK.Caption
Number of events above a given SNR threshold per year in the three scenarios considered for the time-delay distribution.Caption
Credible intervals on the confidence that the mass distribution is bimodal as a function of the number of events and for the different values of $\alpha_{\rm L}$. The red horizontal line corresponds to a probability of 0.95.Caption
Upper panel: reconstructions of the redshift distributions for increasing catalogue sizes. Coloured bands show the $90\%$ credible intervals for the light (red) and heavy (golden) populations. Solid lines indicate the median reconstructions, while dashed lines mark the true distributions. For the heavy population, the dashed and full lines superimpose almost perfectly. Lower panel: distribution of within-population and between-populations KS statistics. The value on top shows the probability that the two heavy and light population have different redshift distributions.Caption
Credible intervals on the confidence with which we can determine that the redshift distribution of the light and of the heavy population are different as a function of the number of events and for the different values of $\alpha_{\rm L}$. The red horizontal line corresponds to a probability of 0.95.Caption
Comparison between the parametrisation of~\cite{Galaudage:2020zst} for the light population and ours in terms of total mass and mass ratio.Caption
Comparison between the parametrisation of~\cite{Galaudage:2020zst} for the heavy population of ours in terms of total mass and mass ratio.Caption
Reconstructions of the total mass and mass ratio distributions for increasing catalogue sizes. Coloured bands show the $90\%$ credible intervals for the light (red) and heavy (golden) populations. Solid lines indicate the median reconstructions, while dashed lines mark the true distributions.References
- Abac, A. et al. 2025a [arXiv:2503.12263]
- Abac, A. G. et al. 2025b [arXiv:2508.18083]
- Abbott, B. P. et al. 2017, Phys. Rev. Lett., 119, 161101
- Abbott, B. P. et al. 2020, Astrophys. J. Lett., 892, L3
- Alsing, J., Silva, H. O., & Berti, E. 2018, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 478, 1377
- Antoniadis, J., Tauris, T. M., Ozel, F., et al. 2016 [arXiv:1605.01665]
- Belczynski, K., Kalogera, V., & Bulik, T. 2002, ApJ, 572, 407
- Belczynski, K. et al. 2018, Astron. Astrophys., 615, A91
- Borhanian, S. 2021, Class. Quant. Grav., 38, 175014
- Branchesi, M. et al. 2023, JCAP, 07, 068
- Chruslinska, M., Belczynski, K., Klencki, J., & Benacquista, M. 2018, Mon. Not.
- Roy. Astron. Soc., 474, 2937
- Chu, Q., Lu, Y., & Yu, S. 2025, Astrophys. J., 980, 181
- Danilishin, S. & Zhang, T. 2023, ET sensitivity curves used for CoBA Science
- Study, Technical Report ET-0304B-22, Einstein Telescope Collaboration de Sá, L. M., Rocha, L. S., Bernardo, A., Bachega, R. R. A., & Horvath, J. E.
- 2024, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 535, 2041
- Dewi, J. D. M. & Pols, O. R. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 629
- Essick, R. 2023, Phys. Rev. D, 108, 043011
- Evans, M. et al. 2021 [arXiv:2109.09882]
- Evans, M. et al. 2023 [arXiv:2306.13745]
- Farah, A. 2022, GWMockCat: A lightweight code to generate mock catalogs of gravitational-wave sources, https://git.ligo.org/amanda.farah/
- GWMockCat, gitLab repository, release v1 (May 03, 2022)
- Farah, A. M., Edelman, B., Zevin, M., et al. 2023, Astrophys. J., 955, 107
- Farr, W. M. & Chatziioannou, K. 2020, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 4, 65
- Farrow, N., Zhu, X.-J., & Thrane, E. 2019, Astrophys. J., 876, 18
- Finn, L. S. & Chernoff, D. F. 1993, Phys. Rev. D, 47, 2198
- Fishbach, M., Farr, W. M., & Holz, D. E. 2020, Astrophys. J. Lett., 891, L31
- Galaudage, S., Adamcewicz, C., Zhu, X.-J., Stevenson, S., & Thrane, E. 2021, Astrophys. J. Lett., 909, L19
- García-Quirós, C., Colleoni, M., Husa, S., et al. 2020, Phys. Rev. D, 102, 064002
- Gerosa, D. & Bellotti, M. 2024, Class. Quant. Grav., 41, 125002
- Hartigan, J. & Hartigan, P. 1985, Annals of Statistics, 13, 70
- Iorio, G. et al. 2023, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 524, 426
- Karnesis, N., Katz, M. L., Korsakova, N., Gair, J. R., & Stergioulas, N. 2023, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 526, 4814
- Korol, V. & Safarzadeh, M. 2021, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 502, 5576
- Madau, P. & Dickinson, M. 2014, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 52, 415
- Mandel, I., Farr, W. M., & Gair, J. R. 2019, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 486, 1086
- Maoz, D. & Nakar, E. 2025, Astrophys. J., 982, 179
- Nair, A. & Stevenson, S. 2025 [arXiv:2508.15624]
- Özel, F. & Freire, P. 2016, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 54, 401
- Ozel, F., Psaltis, D., Narayan, R., & Villarreal, A. S. 2012, Astrophys. J., 757, 55
- Pellouin, C., Dvorkin, I., & Lehoucq, L. 2025, Astron. Astrophys., 693, A283
- Qin, Y. et al. 2024, Astron. Astrophys., 691, A214
- Regimbau, T. et al. 2012, Phys. Rev. D, 86, 122001
- Romero-Shaw, I. M., Farrow, N., Stevenson, S., Thrane, E., & Zhu, X.-J. 2020, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 496, L64
- Safarzadeh, M., Ramirez-Ruiz, E., & Berger, E. 2020, Astrophys. J., 900, 13
- Shao, D.-S., Tang, S.-P., Jiang, J.-L., & Fan, Y.-Z. 2020, Phys. Rev. D, 102, 063006
- Talbot, C. & Golomb, J. 2023, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 526, 3495
- Tauris, T. M. et al. 2017, Astrophys. J., 846, 170
- Tenorio, R., Toubiana, A., Bruel, T., Gerosa, D., & Gair, J. R. 2025, Astrophys.
- J. Lett., 994, L52
- Toubiana, A., Wong, K. W. K., Babak, S., et al. 2021, Phys. Rev. D, 104, 083027
- Urlus, R. 2025, diptest: Hartigan’s dip test for unimodality (Python/C++), python package implementing Hartigan and Hartigan’s dip test for unimodality
- Vigna-Gómez, A., Neijssel, C. J., Stevenson, S., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 481, 4009
- Vitale, S., Gerosa, D., Farr, W. M., & Taylor, S. R. 2020, in Handbook of Gravitational Wave Astronomy (Springer)
- Ye, C. S., Fong, W.-f., Kremer, K., et al. 2020, Astrophys. J. Lett., 888, L10
- Zevin, M., Bavera, S. S., Berry, C. P. L., et al. 2021, Astrophys. J., 910, 152
- Zevin, M., Nugent, A. E., Adhikari, S., et al. 2022, Astrophys. J. Lett., 940, L18